º¬Ðß²ÝÉçÇø

To what extent does party autonomy hold sway over contracts that involve exceptional or prohibited clauses?

Delhi High Court says interest accrued on arbitration awards end when funds are accessible for claimant

The Supreme Court of India clarified jurisdiction issues for Indian courts in cross-border contracts and arbitration

The Delhi High Court rules res judicata bars successive applications for arbitral reference if the identical request was previously rejected

The Supreme Court held that a clause using permissive language like ¡°may¡± does not form a binding arbitration agreement under section 7  

Delhi HC sets aside interim injunction in director removal dispute, highlights corporate governance limits under arbitration law

Delhi High Court ruled on limits to petitions under section 11(6) in Tirupati Constwell v Delhi States (2025)

Supreme Court limits interference in arbitral awards under section 34

Arbitration is favored for commercial disputes, but judicial review remains debated

Delhi High Court ruled on whether arbitration awards qualified as ICA, limiting judicial review compared to domestic arbitration

The Supreme Court allows time extensions for arbitral awards past the mandate expiry with sufficient cause

Despite years of promoting India as an arbitration hub, the Ministry of Finance now urges government departments to reduce reliance on arbitration

The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgment, in Dani Wooltex Corporation & Ors v Sheil Properties & Anr

Supreme Court invalidates arbitration clauses in Lombardi Engineering Ltd v Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Deposit requirement and government-appointed arbitrators ruled unconstitutional

In Batliboi v Hindustan Petroleum, the Supreme Court affirmed the arbitrator's right to interpret contract terms reasonably, barring award annulment

In a recent judgment, the Bombay High Court dealt with the issue of stamp duty on non-disclosure agreements containing an arbitration clause

Issues on institutional domestic and international commercial arbitration were discussed at a Federation of Indian Corporate Lawyers (FICL) event on 17 March

The Bombay High Court recently heard a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The recourse of referring to facilitation council would be available to parties only in the event of there being no clause in the contract that states that the resolution of a dispute shall be done by way of arbitration

Where there is merely a possibility of the parties agreeing to arbitration in the future, in contrast to an obligation to refer disputes to arbitration, there is no valid and binding arbitration agreement

In a Supreme Court judgment it was held that section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be used to record reasons for findings already produced in an award