º¬Ðß²ÝÉçÇø

SC rules bidders cannot be disqualified for non-submission of a JVA unless expressly mandated by clear tender terms

Supreme Court clarifies CERC powers under sections 79 and 178 of the Electricity Act in Power Grid v MPPTCL case

Delhi High Court ruled on limits to petitions under section 11(6) in Tirupati Constwell v Delhi States (2025)

º¬Ðß²ÝÉçÇø definitive legal awards celebrate and commend innovation, expertise, and excellence in the profession

SC: Penalty under CP Act can't be stayed during interim moratorium under IBC section 96, rules in recent judgment

Delhi High Court ruled in BPSL v Union of India (2025) that a corporate debtor cannot be prosecuted for pre-CIRP offences after resolution approval

Delhi High Court ruled on DMRC¡¯s Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award to HCC Samsung JV, focusing on the limitation period

Delhi High Court examined the interplay between the IBC and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Delhi High Court, in Isar Engineers v NTPC-SAIL Power (2025), ruled that arbitrator independence is a complex issue

NCLAT ruled balance sale consideration is not "financial debt" under the IBC

The Supreme Court allows time extensions for arbitral awards past the mandate expiry with sufficient cause

In the case of Venkatraman Krishnamurthy and Anr v Lodha Crown Buildmart Private Limited

Supreme Court clarifies arrest procedure in Ram Kishor Arora v Directorate of Enforcement, ensuring compliance with PMLA and constitutional rights.

Bombay HC orders MSEDCL to acquire land under Land Acquisition Act, pay in 3 months

The Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC) names Arush Khanna, co-founder and partner at Numen Law Offices, as the first ambassador for India in 49 years

In Batliboi v Hindustan Petroleum, the Supreme Court affirmed the arbitrator's right to interpret contract terms reasonably, barring award annulment

How should law firms effectively harness legal technology? Is anything off the table?

Promote mediation for justice, but the bill makes it too prescriptive, eroding its voluntary nature

A fundamental principle of º¬Ðß²ÝÉçÇø arbitration law is to have limited judicial intervention in the process

In this case, a dispute arose between the appellant contractors and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) over a contract for a bypass construction project

The Supreme Court¡¯s 3 May judgment, in MK Rajagopalan v Dr Periasamy Palani Gounder & Anr, shows insolvency resolution plans must be approved by a committee of creditors before being put to an adjudicating authority

The Supreme Court has shed light on the application of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, and the General Clauses Act, 1897, in arbitration awards

Supreme Court judgment on 25 April 2023 (NN Global Mercantile Pvt Ltd v Indo Unique Flame Ltd) finally settled the ongoing legal conundrum of the enforceability of an arbitration agreement in an unstamped contract

An April 2023 decision by a division bench of the Supreme Court of India has held that arbitration is the appropriate method of deciding whether a development agreement can be lawfully cancelled

The court held that the admission should be enforced against the defendant, but that such enforcement should be performed by both parties carrying out the conditions that were in, or attached to, the admission

It was further held that the court at the referral stage can interfere only when it is manifest that the claims are ex facie time-barred and dead, or there is no subsisting dispute

In the recent case of Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt Ltd v Tata Sia Airlines Ltd, an interim injunction was filed against TATA Sia Airline (the defendant) by Frankfinn Aviation Services (plaintiff) in the Delhi High Court

The recourse of referring to facilitation council would be available to parties only in the event of there being no clause in the contract that states that the resolution of a dispute shall be done by way of arbitration

Where there is merely a possibility of the parties agreeing to arbitration in the future, in contrast to an obligation to refer disputes to arbitration, there is no valid and binding arbitration agreement

The tug of war over jurisdiction has surfaced many times in arbitration proceedings, necessitating the Supreme Court to step in repeatedly to settle disputes

Delhi High Court?has ruled that courts must lean towards referring matters to arbitration when one party seeks to negate an arbitration agreement by citing other provisions of a contract that require detailed interpretation

As the IBC clearly differentiates between financial debt and operational debt obligations, the question becomes whether interest can be included in both these types of debt for the admission of a company into insolvency under the IBC

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision of the Tripura High Court by refusing to interfere with its judgment that decree holders cannot be treated the same as financial creditors

In a Supreme Court judgment it was held that section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be used to record reasons for findings already produced in an award

The Indian Supreme Court has set aside an arbitral tribunal¡¯s award for acting beyond the confines of a contract executed between parties

In a celebration of hard work, ingenuity and excellence, India Business Law Journal reveals the winners of the 2022 Indian Law Firm Awards