含羞草社区

Beyond navigating employment laws, in-house counsel are ensuring their organisations grasp forward-looking inclusion issues to create an attractive workplace. TATA SIA Airlines (Vistara) legal executives Shashank Jain and Ayushi Yadav examine the new rules of the game

The role of the modern in-house counsel in employment matters has expanded to make them a strategic driver of growth by shaping workplaces that are more inclusive and attractive.

Once in-house teams were limited to ensuring compliance, providing interpretation support, helping review employment contracts and dealing with employment litigation. Now they find themselves at the cutting edge of the new economy.

Today’s reality is that attracting talent is daunting and retaining talent is even harder. Remuneration is no longer the sole motivating factor. New and complex challenges arise from the evolving economy and new-age sectors, while complying with employment laws that were designed to cater for a more traditional economy.

The basics

Employment laws flow from the directive principles of state policy (part IV of the Constitution of India), which require just and humane work conditions, fair wages and maternity benefits for women.

Based on this, existing employment laws aim to provide financial protection, health, safety, well-being and economic safety. Statutes such as the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, and the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, were enacted to ensure timely payment of wages, while statutes like the Factories Act, 1948, the Plantations Labour Act, 1951, and the Mines Act, 1952, created basic employment conditions.

Today, these statutes have lost much relevance; many contain redundancies that have not kept pace with changing times. Examples include: maintaining spittoons; lime washing workplaces every few years; keeping several employee registers in hard copy; and giving full and final settlement to any terminated employee within two working days.

While changes are on the horizon, in-house counsel need to get creative with meeting existing requirements until proposed labour codes take effect. For instance: advising how to make premises “no-spit zones”, backing digital employee registers with printouts as needed, maintaining white wash records and preparing hand books on managing inspections.

The presence of women in the workforce has led to legislation such as the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (PoSH Act). Similarly, statutes have been enacted to make workplaces more inclusive, such as the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 (Transgender Persons Act), and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017 (the HIV Act).

Applying these laws varies on the nature and form of an organisation. In view of this, an in-house counsel’s scope of work is no longer limited to one-time activities. It requires regular monitoring and promoting of their organisation’s diversity and inclusivity.

PoSH Act

The female-centric PoSH Act is aimed at stopping workplace sexual harassment against women, starting from implied sexual advances or express unwelcome behaviour. Among other things, the PoSH Act requires organisations to have an internal committee for handling sexual harassment complaints. The statute obliges employers to organise anti-harassment workshops and awareness programmes for employees and apprise them of the consequences. Delhi High Court has stipulated guidelines for these internal committees, including:

• That members not have any conflict of interest/connection with the complainant;
• The independent member/external member should not be related to the organisation;
• There should be no undue pressure or influence on the members of the internal committee by senior level employees/management; and
• There should be a clear and precise procedure to deal with sexual harassment complaints.

However, the Supreme Court has recognised “serious lapses” in implementation of the PoSH Act in government/public sector organisations, and has issued time-bound detailed directions to ensure its effectiveness.

While the legislation recognises sexual harassment of female employees only and precludes same-gender complaints, the practical realities beg to differ. Sexual harassment is not a gender-specific issue and can equally apply to male and third-gender employees. Thus, while various courts continue to discuss and interpret the issues of the PoSH Act, the role of in-house counsel includes carefully interpreting the statute, apprising management and developing gender-neutral policies.